Category: Communication


Get your taxes in? It was a sprint to the mailbox for many of us, but the sense of relief (or resignation) gave way to genuine interest yesterday afternoon at Three Pillar’s first Global Product Mindset series forum — Leveraging Cloud Concepts for Product Development.

Featured speakers where a trio of execs and experts from Eloqua, a company that has created a very successful marketing automation platform. PeakTwo founders Mike and Jay cut their online teeth managing targeted online marketing campaigns during the dotcom boom (RIP LifeMinders). It was a meticulous and labor intensive. The intellects at Eloqua have found a way to automate, manage, and refine that process with a level of speed and precision that, frankly, blew our minds a bit. It was like explaining supersonic flight to a couple guys who used to be motorcycle mechanics. Very cool.

What’s the impending impact on today’s marketing efforts? We’re sussing that out for ourselves, but the potential seems massive. Eloqua’s clients can already attest to that. After the presentation, we knocked a couple back with Senior VP Andre Yee, who elaborated on a couple of compelling presentation points. Overall, however, he was emphatic about the mission of marketing:

It’s about revenue, and that there is a direct correlation between effective marketing automation and good ol’ profit. In so many words, he explained the critical importance of understanding customers. The right targeting coupled with informed follow up relevant to their initial interactions is almost a lock to generate revenue. It’s not intuition; it’s science, and Eloqua is committed to perfecting the formula. With more than 250 customers having already logged two billion interactions with the software, Eloqua is generating a pretty accurate process for generating revenue within specific industries. Now, it’s poised to really turn it up.

Remember the scene in Pulp Fiction where Jules and Vincent are putting the hurt on Brett and his buddies? Of course you do. A particular moment of tension came when Jules was hammering him with questions regarding his familiarity with Marcellus Wallace. The only reply Brett could manage was sputtering, panicked repetition of the word “What?” Fed up, Jules pulls his pistol, points it at Brad’s face and commands him to “Say ‘What?’ again!” The implication being that if Brett did, he would be on the receiving end of Mr. 9 Millimeter (his ultimate fate anyway).

I cite this exchange because I understand how Jules feels upon hearing an especially annoying term again and again. In my case, it’s the use of meaningless market-speak. Brainstorms are rotten with expressions that sound significant, but upon further review mean absolutely nothing. My current favorite is “Best of Breed”, which seemed to be on the outs pre-recession. For some reason, it’s enjoying a comeback and I’m fighting it with every ounce of strength I can muster. What is this, the Westminster Kennel Club? You can’t tell me you’re the best at something and then use some nondescript term with the hope that I don’t scrutinize your assertion. What breed are you talking about? The product itself? Your company’s industry? The micro-niche you’re hoping to fill? Chesapeake Bay Retriever? Meaningless, over-wrought drivel.

We all appreciate the value of concision. We all strive for clarity. But good communication also requires some heavy lifting. Take some bandwidth to explain what it is you mean in plain English. You can’t throw up a smokescreen of corporate-bingo bs and hope we don’t press you for the details.

If your medium doesn’t allow for too much detail, then a key part of your message has to be inviting your audience to follow up for more info. That means prioritizing messaging for your websites, print ads, and collateral — which have a relatively small amount of space. That doesn’t mean devoting that precious real estate to terms so vacuous and vague that they fall apart under just a bit of scrutiny. Give us an essential point. Encourage us to contact or click deeper for more info. It’s okay to ask audiences to work a bit, especially if there’s an informational reward.

Apologies for the rant. I’m in a transitional period and I want to help you.

Confession time. The biggest challenge we face when working with clients is not developing messaging, working up a cool logo, or designing a smart social media strategy. The biggest challenge is earning client trust. We don’t begrudge that reality. It would be foolish to expect any client to sign off wholesale on our concepts or content.

But we also know that our skills can too easily be taken for granted. There’s an inherent “here’s how I would do it” impulse reverberating through the client/creative relationship. Write a line of content, pick a color palette for a website, and there’s going to be someone on the client side who wants to change cyan to cerulean, or “happy” to “glad”. This hairsplitting is part of the process, though at its worst it can bury deadlines and cause costly, contentious delays. Often, of course, the feedback is welcome and even warranted — part of the healthy back-and-forth any client and consultant should have.

Our challenge, and something we diplomatically try to address with clients, is asking that we be allowed to simply do our job. Most folks get this from day one and projects progress as planned. There are those times, however, when someone is set on having his or her fingerprints on every phase of a project. Our line of work invites that kind of involvement.

Why? Communications and design are deceptively accessible. What we do is hardly mystical. We write, we talk, we draw pretty pictures, whether on paper or on screen. Unlike lawyers and physicians, or even mechanics and carpenters, we don’t present distinct skills possessed only by well-trained professionals– at least at first glance. Everybody can write. Everybody can sketch a stickfigure on a cocktail napkin.  Not everyone can decipher tax code or prescribe medicine; when those professionals speak, we tend to take their counsel as gospel.

Not so in our case. It’s comparatively easy to share extra ideas, impress vision, and exclaim, “I took care of this for you guys!” Can we offer our grateful thanks, but also ask that you allow us to get something into a workable status before the duck-biting begins? If that sounds snarky, we apologize, but a bit of tough love is sometimes warranted. We know trust is something we have to earn, but we also know that we need to run fairly untethered to do our best work, and therefore earn that trust. Grant us that, and we guarantee you’ll be pleased when the dust settles.

TL;DR

This cryptic four-letter designation has been cropping up with increasing regularity. Most often, it’s at the end of a long forum or blog comment. Some take offense at the terse quartet, but it offers a valuable lesson in concision.

First things first: Too Long; Didn’t Read. That’s its meaning, but what is its significance? Perhaps it’s symptomatic of an information-saturated online culture that doesn’t have the time to soak up every tasty detail. The audience wants the bottom line, the takeaway, as quickly and concisely as possible.

Certainly, you could go on and on providing detailed examples supporting your point of view, drop in references and citations to other works, link to corresponding content, and season the whole thing with copious quotes. But that is so much reinforcement to whatever it is you’re trying to communicate.

The reality is that online audiences are not hasty because they are so easily distracted. They actually want to remain hyper-engaged. They want all the essential info, but they’re scrolling through RSS feeds, skimming aggregators, checking their karma and threads, and contemplating — for the briefest of moments — whether or not your content is worth their engagement. All of that is contingent on a continuously evolving ability to prioritize content based on headlines, pull quotes, and search-engine summaries.

You might find TL;DR an inelegant phenomenon. It suggests we’re all just too damn busy to read anything, but the opposite is true. We want to read everything. We just want to get it as quickly as we can. If you’re going to ramble on, make sure you respect the reader’s need to get the good stuff as easily as possible. The writer/poster who couples TL;DR to a one-sentence thesis is demonstrating welcome online civility. It’s an acknowledgment that we’re busy and appreciate getting the highlights if we don’t have time to read something in its entirety. What’s more, if it’s done well, it can actually determine whether or not someone will take the time to read something start to finish.

TL;DR: We don’t have the time or patience to read everything we want.  Keep content concise and if you must expound, respect your audience by providing an easy-to-spot summary.

Powered by Wordpress and Motion by 85ideas.