Latest Entries »

Remember the scene in Pulp Fiction where Jules and Vincent are putting the hurt on Brett and his buddies? Of course you do. A particular moment of tension came when Jules was hammering him with questions regarding his familiarity with Marcellus Wallace. The only reply Brett could manage was sputtering, panicked repetition of the word “What?” Fed up, Jules pulls his pistol, points it at Brad’s face and commands him to “Say ‘What?’ again!” The implication being that if Brett did, he would be on the receiving end of Mr. 9 Millimeter (his ultimate fate anyway).

I cite this exchange because I understand how Jules feels upon hearing an especially annoying term again and again. In my case, it’s the use of meaningless market-speak. Brainstorms are rotten with expressions that sound significant, but upon further review mean absolutely nothing. My current favorite is “Best of Breed”, which seemed to be on the outs pre-recession. For some reason, it’s enjoying a comeback and I’m fighting it with every ounce of strength I can muster. What is this, the Westminster Kennel Club? You can’t tell me you’re the best at something and then use some nondescript term with the hope that I don’t scrutinize your assertion. What breed are you talking about? The product itself? Your company’s industry? The micro-niche you’re hoping to fill? Chesapeake Bay Retriever? Meaningless, over-wrought drivel.

We all appreciate the value of concision. We all strive for clarity. But good communication also requires some heavy lifting. Take some bandwidth to explain what it is you mean in plain English. You can’t throw up a smokescreen of corporate-bingo bs and hope we don’t press you for the details.

If your medium doesn’t allow for too much detail, then a key part of your message has to be inviting your audience to follow up for more info. That means prioritizing messaging for your websites, print ads, and collateral — which have a relatively small amount of space. That doesn’t mean devoting that precious real estate to terms so vacuous and vague that they fall apart under just a bit of scrutiny. Give us an essential point. Encourage us to contact or click deeper for more info. It’s okay to ask audiences to work a bit, especially if there’s an informational reward.

Apologies for the rant. I’m in a transitional period and I want to help you.

If you read the account of our online/constant-connection obsession in the Washington Post, you know the PeakTwo partners loves us some technology. We’re also crazy movie junkies (you can’t touch us on Reservoir Dogs references) and seeing who can out-pace the other in TV size — Mike takes that hands down, BTW.

In that video-Internet-hypermedia spirit, we’re definitely pleased to announce the launch of Kylo.tv, the site we’ve built with Hillcrest Labs, the Kylo creators. So what’s Kylo? A super-sized web browser built specifically to work on your big screen HDTV. We’re having a blast with it, watching movies on NetFlix, and scrolling through our favorite YouTube vids.

Our work with Hillcrest began last fall, when we came in to help build some awareness of the Loop Pointer, a funky wireless Web navigator that — surprise — works great with Kylo. We ginned up some holiday momentum, built a microsite and some point-of-purchase collateral. Fun, B2C stuff. Between the Loop and Kylo, we may not watch broadcast, cable or satellite TV again.

Check it out. Let us know what you think of the site, and of Kylo itself — the download is free.

Confession time. The biggest challenge we face when working with clients is not developing messaging, working up a cool logo, or designing a smart social media strategy. The biggest challenge is earning client trust. We don’t begrudge that reality. It would be foolish to expect any client to sign off wholesale on our concepts or content.

But we also know that our skills can too easily be taken for granted. There’s an inherent “here’s how I would do it” impulse reverberating through the client/creative relationship. Write a line of content, pick a color palette for a website, and there’s going to be someone on the client side who wants to change cyan to cerulean, or “happy” to “glad”. This hairsplitting is part of the process, though at its worst it can bury deadlines and cause costly, contentious delays. Often, of course, the feedback is welcome and even warranted — part of the healthy back-and-forth any client and consultant should have.

Our challenge, and something we diplomatically try to address with clients, is asking that we be allowed to simply do our job. Most folks get this from day one and projects progress as planned. There are those times, however, when someone is set on having his or her fingerprints on every phase of a project. Our line of work invites that kind of involvement.

Why? Communications and design are deceptively accessible. What we do is hardly mystical. We write, we talk, we draw pretty pictures, whether on paper or on screen. Unlike lawyers and physicians, or even mechanics and carpenters, we don’t present distinct skills possessed only by well-trained professionals– at least at first glance. Everybody can write. Everybody can sketch a stickfigure on a cocktail napkin.  Not everyone can decipher tax code or prescribe medicine; when those professionals speak, we tend to take their counsel as gospel.

Not so in our case. It’s comparatively easy to share extra ideas, impress vision, and exclaim, “I took care of this for you guys!” Can we offer our grateful thanks, but also ask that you allow us to get something into a workable status before the duck-biting begins? If that sounds snarky, we apologize, but a bit of tough love is sometimes warranted. We know trust is something we have to earn, but we also know that we need to run fairly untethered to do our best work, and therefore earn that trust. Grant us that, and we guarantee you’ll be pleased when the dust settles.

TL;DR

This cryptic four-letter designation has been cropping up with increasing regularity. Most often, it’s at the end of a long forum or blog comment. Some take offense at the terse quartet, but it offers a valuable lesson in concision.

First things first: Too Long; Didn’t Read. That’s its meaning, but what is its significance? Perhaps it’s symptomatic of an information-saturated online culture that doesn’t have the time to soak up every tasty detail. The audience wants the bottom line, the takeaway, as quickly and concisely as possible.

Certainly, you could go on and on providing detailed examples supporting your point of view, drop in references and citations to other works, link to corresponding content, and season the whole thing with copious quotes. But that is so much reinforcement to whatever it is you’re trying to communicate.

The reality is that online audiences are not hasty because they are so easily distracted. They actually want to remain hyper-engaged. They want all the essential info, but they’re scrolling through RSS feeds, skimming aggregators, checking their karma and threads, and contemplating — for the briefest of moments — whether or not your content is worth their engagement. All of that is contingent on a continuously evolving ability to prioritize content based on headlines, pull quotes, and search-engine summaries.

You might find TL;DR an inelegant phenomenon. It suggests we’re all just too damn busy to read anything, but the opposite is true. We want to read everything. We just want to get it as quickly as we can. If you’re going to ramble on, make sure you respect the reader’s need to get the good stuff as easily as possible. The writer/poster who couples TL;DR to a one-sentence thesis is demonstrating welcome online civility. It’s an acknowledgment that we’re busy and appreciate getting the highlights if we don’t have time to read something in its entirety. What’s more, if it’s done well, it can actually determine whether or not someone will take the time to read something start to finish.

TL;DR: We don’t have the time or patience to read everything we want.  Keep content concise and if you must expound, respect your audience by providing an easy-to-spot summary.

Notice anything interesting about the ads during the Olympics? Tech trend blogger and Forbes.com columnist Steve Rubel did. He noticed when pen-maker Uniball wrapped up its ad by asking viewers to check out its Facebook page. Instead of driving the audience to the company website, the commercial was pushing people to its booming social network presence.

Money quote from Mr. Rubel:

” . . . a controversial shift is underway. The trusty dot-com URL, at least its role in marketing, maybe dying. Some companies are de-emphasizing spaces they own, like their web site, in all of their ads. Instead, they’re pushing people towards spaces they rent where people are spending time – e.g. their Twitter, YouTube Facebook hubs.”

We’ve been crowing about participating in multiple online platforms to create your “web presence” (see our last e-newsletter for specifics). The trend Rubel introduces is telling. Don’t just ask anonymous audiences to visit your site. Invite them to join a thriving online community offering ample interactive opportunity. And free stuff doesn’t hurt either.

In case you missed it, yesterday’s Washington Post and MSNBC Online featured an article examining tortured souls who can’t control their addiction to smartphones. PeakTwo founding partners Mike Granetz and Jay Ferrari were two of the tortured souls featured.

The article kicked up plenty of online chatter. Feedback forums for WaPo and MSNBC, which uses Newsvine, had in excess of 100 comments. Stepping back from the controversy and critique, we found it to be a fascinating example of how content impact can evolve (maybe mutate is a better word) depending on audience.

Comparing three online outlets — the Post reader forum, the MSNBC Newsvine forum, and Facebook — it was interesting to observe trends in feedback tenor.

Readers at the Washington Post, which trend toward an older demographic, were tough. Jay was accused of negligent parenting. Mike was a detached husband. Many people were, to be blunt, just nuts. They worked in personal agendas and launched personal attacks. The animosity would have been unsettling to those who don’t realize those folks tend to be a bit ahem marginal upstairs.

MSNBC readers were on a bit more even keel. While the forum’s debate had a bit of personal vitriol, it swung between the dangers of this alleged addiction and the overall advantages of technology. Those readers trend a bit younger, a bit more savvy with online media. Not surprising that more participants would defend innovation and dismiss the stodgy hysteria that dominated WaPo.

Facebook was all congrats and smiles. Of course, we’re referring to our personal and company accounts — the classic captive audience. That’s important to note, however. We’ve built rosters of friends and followers who know us and can see past a one-dimensional depiction.

For this crowd, the placement was a big win for company awareness. Instead of being seen as negligent or absent, we were praised as being well-connected consultants and “hip” parents/husbands who went to great lengths to balance entrepreneurial and familial responsibility.

What does this demonstrate? You can count on a single message to change based on audience perception and agenda. What follows is a need to be present on as many platforms as possible, to lead the response when you can, and participate in the resulting dialog.

At times, you’ll be handing over your identity to fate. Make the front page of a major daily and you can’t be quite sure what will happen. The impressions, positive or negative, are invaluable. We’re sure happy about the SEO impact, for example, and will talk more about that in the next post.

Not our words, but rather those of Washington Post writer Mike Rosenwald, who interviewed us regarding the perils of smartphone obsession.

Money quote: Ferrari and Granetz live for when they get an alert from their iPhones about new information or a new version of an app. The flow of information never ceases. Neither does the thrill of anticipation.

Our iPhone love may border on the unhealthy (for the record, Jay claims that he had total command of the bathtub incident) but it also represents our unwavering need to remain connected and to communicate. We know reachability and responsiveness are now 24-7. Anything that facilitates that access — for clients, friends, family, whomever — is good by us.

Connected Life – It’s Personal

We have a love-hate relationship with the world’s most popular on-screen program. PowerPoint is an easy way to bang out some eye-catching (though not necessarily compelling) visuals that might enliven an otherwise staid speech. But it’s also become the single biggest enabler of unimaginative pitches and presentations.

We all know the critique:

So, do we kick this insipid presentation program cold-turkey? What do we do in it’s place?

During the past two years of pitches and presentations, we’ve been able to steer clear of PowerPoint. Instead, we’ve tried to write relatively concise proposals and work through them unscripted, using only a white board and our short-term memory. The result has been a much more conversational exchange with clients and prospects. We have, on occasion, used PowerPoint to distill a couple proposals into easy-to-digest formats.

But perhaps we’re just jumping on the “PPT Sucks” bandwagon. We’d love to hear from anyone who is using it with consistently positive reception.

Post your best PPT defense below. Our favorite will get a complimentary template design consultation.

Well, it’s as big of a deal as you make it. But the point is that mere presence does not constitute influence. If you’re a tween obsessed with Twilight, tweet all you want about what your cat is doing and how your parents are lame and what’s on your latest playlist.

But if you’re a business looking to get some mileage out of social media (not just picking on Twitter exclusively, though explaining its benefits prompts the most head-scratching from many) you need to concentrate on substantive content. You need to offer intrinsic value.

We’ve been in conversation with more than a few professional peers who get all wide-eyed about participating in any number of social media platforms. What’s frustrating — no, infuriating — is that too many think the game ends when you simply step on the field. But that’s barely the beginning. These folks are missing the bigger picture. Channel isn’t strategy; it’s just another outlet.

Now, the mission is to use these social media tools effectively. How? By pushing out credible information, whether self authored, found through sources you respect, or (ideally) a well-syncopated combination of both. You need to engage your audience, ask them questions, offer up free expertise, etc. Then, and only then, with extreme discretion, would you push something self-promotional or self-congratulatory.

You’re trying to cast yourself as a reliable source. That’s how you’ll build a following. You want to tell people how long the line is at Starbucks? Fine. Expound on the antics of your toddler? Your choice. But if you don’t mix in a juicy dose of valuable insight and information, I’ll un-follow your inanity faster than a Jersey Shore spray-tan session.

Powered by Wordpress and Motion by 85ideas.